Minister Hogan concerned at exploitation by professionals: BC(A)R SI.9

StanleyBrian

In the following exchange from 12th March 2014, Brian Stanley TD discusses the huge costs incurred under BC(A)R SI.9 with Minister Hogan, and takes issue with the costs noted by the Minister and his Department to date.

link here: Kildarestreet.com: debates Building+control#g33

Extract from debate:

Brian Stanley (Laois-Offaly, Sinn Fein):

“My question deals with the new building regulations for the construction of both one-off houses and multi-unit complexes. In those regulations, the Minister has not differentiated between the two, which is the problem and the nub of my question. The regulation process is causing enormous concern. I have heard that professionals are looking for between €20,000 and €50,000 to sign off on construction and I ask the Minister to comment on that, given that he gave estimates of between €1,000 and €3,000 previously. I have a quotation here for €18,012.35 for a modest house in County Laois, for example…

The Minister has given a cash cow to architects and chartered surveyors. He said they will charge between €1,000 and €3,000 but I have seen a quotation for €18,000…

Coming from a rural constituency, the Minister will agree that the quality of self-build is generally good. A farmer who builds his or her own house will stand over the work. We do not want to make the costs prohibitive, however. The experience of shopping around to date is that high prices are being quoted. The aforementioned quote of €18,000 is for a modest dwelling. The Minister clarified the big question of whether the local subcontractor, plasterer or bricklayer can be hired in. He has stated unequivocally that if I am involved in a self-build I can do that. However, the issue of the assigned certifier will still cause problems. The local authority building control officers carried out good work but they were under resourced. This could be a self-financing mechanism. If local authorities charged €1,000 or €2,000 for carrying out final inspections, people would be happy to pay them rather than pay €13,000 or €14,000 to somebody in the private sector. The final point I want to make is that housing extensions will be expensive as a result of these regulations.”

Phil Hogan (Minister, Department of Environment, Community and Local Government; Carlow-Kilkenny, Fine Gael):

“I am concerned about the potential for costs to be exploitative initially. The same thing happened in respect of the building energy regulations introduced several years ago by the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. People were charged between €3,000 and €4,000 for certification inspections that cost €150 in the market. The professions have tended to jump on the bandwagon to exploit the customer for what they can get…

I am concerned about the possibility of customers being exploited by professionals under these regulations. I will monitor the situation over the coming weeks and if I detect that the professional bodies are exploiting customers to the extent that the Deputy alleged – he only mentioned one quotation – I am prepared to consider ways of ensuring customers are not financially exploited in the manner to which he alluded.”

0 thoughts on “Minister Hogan concerned at exploitation by professionals: BC(A)R SI.9

  1. amanda gallagher

    More nonsense in the Dail. Minister was concerned of ‘wild exaggerations’ from self builders – here we have more ‘unbelievable understatements’ from him regarding the extortionate cost of SI9. The audacity of him to suggest assigned certifiers would attempt to exploit the client is unforgivable. Saying that, i will forgive him if he bins the SI9!

    Reply
  2. amanda gallagher

    More nonsense in the Dail. Minister was concerned of ‘wild exaggerations’ from self builders – here we have more ‘unbelievable understatements’ from him regarding the extortionate cost of SI9. The audacity of him to suggest assigned certifiers would attempt to exploit the client is unforgivable. Saying that, i will forgive him if he bins the SI9!

    Reply
  3. Pingback: 5 POPULAR MYTHS ABOUT BC(A)R SI.9 | BRegs Blog

  4. Pingback: 5 POPULAR MYTHS ABOUT BC(A)R SI.9 | BRegs Blog

  5. Pingback: 4 tips for sub-contractor Ancillary Certifiers | BRegs Blog

  6. Pingback: 4 tips for sub-contractor Ancillary Certifiers | BRegs Blog

  7. Pingback: Is ‘drawing a house’ as straightforward as ‘delivering the post’? | BRegs Blog

  8. Pingback: Is ‘drawing a house’ as straightforward as ‘delivering the post’? | BRegs Blog

  9. Pingback: What is the business case for BC(A)R? | BRegs Blog

  10. Pingback: What is the business case for BC(A)R? | BRegs Blog

  11. Pingback: Senator Mooney letter to Minister Phil Hogan | BRegs Blog

  12. Pingback: Senator Mooney letter to Minister Phil Hogan | BRegs Blog

  13. Pingback: Senator Paschal Mooney, Minister Hogan and Seanad debate | BRegs Blog

  14. Pingback: Senator Paschal Mooney, Minister Hogan and Seanad debate | BRegs Blog

  15. Pingback: RIAI Prospective Compliances?: BC(A)R SI.9 | BRegs Blog

  16. Pingback: RIAI Prospective Compliances?: BC(A)R SI.9 | BRegs Blog

  17. Pingback: Minister Hogan’s departure- Does this mean somebody can now shout STOP? | BRegs Blog

  18. Pingback: Minister Hogan’s departure- Does this mean somebody can now shout STOP? | BRegs Blog

Leave a Reply to amanda gallagher Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *