A scenario that would leave thousands of homes ruined | Irish Examiner

HouseForSaleSign_large

The following letter to the editor by Lester Naughton MRIAI was published in the Irish Examiner on Wednesday 20th August 2014. Link to original letter here:

Extract:

______

A scenario that would leave thousands of homes ruined | Irish Examiner

“New housing starts at zero and unemployment up 100,000”. This is the headline that your paper may well be printing in the future and I will explain why with a story.

Mary and Paraic are celebrating outside the High Court popping champagne. The judge has just found against the architect who certified their new house. At first, they thought pyrite was causing the structural problems and the architect thought he would not be found liable as he had demanded certificates confirming the absence of pyrite. However it turned out the problem was the steel reinforcing bars used in the concrete. The architect hadn’t thought of seeking certification from the supplier and the judge found the architect had certified the building and was therefore responsible. Mary and Paraic are paid out by the architects’ insurers.

In such a scenario, if such problems turned out to be widespread and thousands of houses are ruined, people will take their cases to the courts and will receive similar judgments. But due to the judgments, it will prove impossible for professionals to renew their insurance. Many professionals will be bankrupted and many homeowners will receive little or no compensation.

Sir I doubt you will find a single architect or lawyer who will not agree this is a plausible scenario. You will only perhaps find disagreement as to its likelihood. Our legislators have let us all down once again.

Lester Naughton BArch MRIAI
Drimmavouhaun
Moycullen
Co Galway

0 thoughts on “A scenario that would leave thousands of homes ruined | Irish Examiner

  1. Finbar O'Brien

    Lester, If the Architect had engaged the services of a Structural Engineer then your above scenario would be less likely to occur. The system does have major flaws as we all know (the omission of Architect Technologists being one close to my heart) but if people can look past the scaremongers and read their own code of conduct of which they should be adhering to then the system would work a lot better than what people think it will. I believe the biggest issue will be professionals offering services which they are not competent to offer and rogue contractors thinking they have no responsibility which will result in more priory hall disasters

    Reply
  2. Finbar O'Brien

    Lester, If the Architect had engaged the services of a Structural Engineer then your above scenario would be less likely to occur. The system does have major flaws as we all know (the omission of Architect Technologists being one close to my heart) but if people can look past the scaremongers and read their own code of conduct of which they should be adhering to then the system would work a lot better than what people think it will. I believe the biggest issue will be professionals offering services which they are not competent to offer and rogue contractors thinking they have no responsibility which will result in more priory hall disasters

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *