SCSI: Republic built 2,000 fewer new homes than official estimate | Irish Times

ft-phantom-4715

13 April 2015

A report published last Wednesday by DKM Economic Consultants and the Society of Chartered Surveyors Ireland (SCSI) confirms that new home building supply problems could be more serious than previously thought. Forecasting residential output for this year at a mere 10,000 units, the report goes on to cast doubt on the veracity or government reporting of residential output for last year, suggesting previous figures have been ‘overstated’.

The BRegs Blog had previously noted this Central Statics Office (CSO) data in earlier posts, and the SCSI, one of the key stakeholders involved in the formation of BC(A)R SI.9, confirmed these findings (quote from Irish Times article “Republic built 2,000 fewer new homes than official estimate“):

“SCSI incoming president, Andrew Nugent, pointed out that official figures show that 11,016 new homes were built in 2014.

“However, the commencement figures are far lower and this suggests to us that the actual level of housebuilding is actually lower than the completions figures suggest,” he said.

Mr Nugent explained that the official estimate of the number of new homes built last year is based number that connected for electricity for the first time.

He said the society believes that up to 20 per cent of the houses connected for electricity in 2014 had been built in previous years and had either been in receivership or owned by the National Asset Management Agency (Nama).

“On that basis, we believe that the actual number of new units built in 2014 was around 8,900 and that it will be around 10,000 in 2015 and 14,000 in 2016,” he said.

“This is significantly lower than other published projections and indicates that the new housing supply issue is even more serious than previously thought”.

Elsewhere in the SCSI report they signal construction output to increase to €11Bn for 2015, but also confirms earlier industry estimates of the extraordinary cost of SI.9 to the industry, consumer and taxpayer.

“The majority of respondents stated that the Building Control (Amendment) Regulations accounted for up to five per cent of the price increases across all categories of dwellings in Dublin and across the rest of the country

This suggests the estimated cost of building regulations introduced last year for all types of construction will be in excess of €500m, a figure similar to the assessment posted by the BRegs Blog last year (see post here). Industry experts had completed a conservative detailed analysis of SI.9 costs sector by sector which was posted by BRegs Blog last year which will be updated this week in light of recent figures.

See full SCSI report “Irish Construction Prospects to 2016′ here.

In our previous post “Cabinet’s ‘spin’ and the real Housing problem | Irish Independent” we looked at efforts by the Government to “spin” or exaggerate zoned development land in Dublin. Rather than zoned land and infrastructure required for development from 2017 and beyond, the real immediate crisis in housing is the catastrophic fall off in new residential commencements in the last year since the introduction of widely criticised Building Control Regulations.

Other posts of interest:

Irish Planning Permissions 2014: The Crisis Drags On | Constantin Gurdgiev

Is Irish Building Control a threat to Foreign Direct Investment? 

€ 5 billion | The extraordinary cost of S.I.9 self-certification by 2020

Building & Construction Activity in Ireland: 2014 | Constantin Gurdgiev

Cabinet’s ‘spin’ and the real Housing problem | Irish Independent

Irish construction sector slowing rapidly | Davy Research

Minister Kelly approves 200 staff: will any go to building control?

Gurdgiev | PMI “a bit bubbly, a bit bonkers…”

Ronan Lyons | Regulations pushing up the costs of homes

1 thought on “SCSI: Republic built 2,000 fewer new homes than official estimate | Irish Times

  1. Andrew Alexander MRIAI

    Two excellent articles in Architecture Ireland Issue 280 Pages 17 and 19 on the challenges of implementing SI.09 succinctly reveal how the defensive and adversarial nature of SI.09 can only result in substantial costs to the consumer – unless the protagonists are “going in” on bargain basement fees to secure the work in these straightened times.

    Reading these articles and reading the equally interesting Building Regs Guidance document from Engineer’s Ireland http://www.engineersireland.ie/EngineersIreland/media/SiteMedia/communications/building-regs/building-regs-guidance-document-march-2015.pdf it becomes very clear that the role of Assigned Certifier can only be undertaken as a distinct appointment within the design team and within architectural practices.

    Practitioners who attempt to juggle tasks and double-job with this legislation will do so at their peril.

    As for the self build sector (who until now preferred to stay clear of appointing any form of design team for their projects) this was clearly never going to work. As a minimum the Instrument mandates that the Assigned Certifier has to prepare and implement an Inspection plan which relies on a suite of ancillary certificates appended to same.

    Consequently in an average self-build project (for the sake of reducing costs) there is no one and nothing upon which to rely.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *