Independent inspection is essential – Flawed building regulations | Irish Examiner


22 April 2015

The following press article appeared last Wednesday 15th April, the same day as the Minister Coffey’s Building Regulations Review private meeting in the Department of the Environment. 

“What is certain, though, is that all new houses are being built in an environment controlled, if that is not too strong a hope or far too strong a word, by regulations introduced by former Environment Minister Phil Hogan — Building Control Regulation SI9. Mr Hogan assured us that the changes would bring an end to light-touch regulation by ending the very questionable practice of self-certification by builders. However, it seems this declaration was wildly over-optimistic if not plainly misleading.

It transpires that, even under legislation supposedly revamped to protect house-buyers, the ‘assigned certifier’ — the architect or engineer who signs off at the end of the build — might be an employee of the developer. This is a blatant conflict of interest and one that seems certain to exact a heavy price on consumers. There are other problems in the new legislation but the most worrying one is that there is still no independent inspection system.

We inspect dead cows, chickens, and pigs to ensure that they are edible. We check dog and television owners to check they have a licence. When we started inspecting nursing homes and homes for the intellectually challenged, we uncovered appalling behaviour and mismanagement. Why can we not inspect buildings before they are put on the market to ensure they comply with building regulations and are fit to live in? Who benefits from this charade put in place by Mr Hogan? Today’s closed and secretive review — the media has been excluded — of the S19 regulations confirms, as if that confirmation were needed, that it is not the public.” [emphasis in bold by BReg Blog]

To see full article click: here

Other posts of interest:

1 thought on “Independent inspection is essential – Flawed building regulations | Irish Examiner

  1. Brian Maher

    It wasn’t just the press that were excluded. The RIAI who “claim” to represent architectural technologists did not include a technologist in their 3 representatives that attended the meeting. This is further proof should any be needed that the RIAI are not a representative body for architectural technologists in this long sorry debacle. The CIAT are and continue to represent their members in the review process. The realities are now clear that in spite of architectural technologists exclusion by the RIAI it is clear that the architect members are slow to act under BCAR while the engineers appear to have taken to the service willingly. Another case of architects services being eroded by blind greed and the unnecessary breaking up of the architectural family that precipitated. The net gainers in rural areas are the non registered architectural service providers forging deals with local engineers and meanwhile the registered (albeit non statutory) are left high and dry. Plus ca change.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *