RIAI President | “2 – 3 million hours a year to inspect new house building”

Hourglass20 October 2015

Much of the concern about  the Building Control Regulations introduced in March 2014 is about the high cost for a system that does not address systems failures of projects like Longboat Quay or Priory Hall. The debate continues over the real cost to building owners versus the benefit in the absence of any comprehensive Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA). Several industry specialists have confirmed to the BRegs Blog that our form of Building Control was adding at least 5% to construction costs across  all sectors. This equates to a cost of at least € 600,000,000 each year which Ireland can ill afford as its construction industry struggles to recover. Last week on RTE’s ‘This Week’  radio programme the President of the RIAI, Robin Mandal, confirmed,

 “As part of this revised Building Control system, the person who inspects, as an independent professional has to be there all the time, we’ve worked out that from start to finish it takes 109 hours to properly inspect a house and to put in place proper inspection regimes; the State cannot afford to do that. If you think of 25,000 houses a year, 109 [man hours] that’s two, nearly three million man hours, that’s going to take an awful lot of Inspectors” (Link to This Week podcast: Here)

The RIAI President has been sounding the alarm for some time about the roll out of the new Building Control regime. Last year he warned the public that the new roles will increase the “time involvement” of professionals by “30% to 50%” (Link:). At that time he also challenged the then Minister for the Environment, Phil Hogan, about the rushed implementation, acknowledging that there had been  “horse-trading” over the amended regulations. (Link:)

This latest advice about the professional input of hours should come as no surprise to the industry or the Department of the Environment. The RIAI have been remarkably consistent and transparent in flagging-up extra hours needed for professionals to undertake new statutory roles in the complex compliance procedures of BC(A)R SI.9. The following RIAI figures confirm the professional hours to comply by the Design and Assigned Certifiers (DC/AC) to undertake new roles. This excludes other specialist and technical costs e.g. ancillary certifiers, engineers, Part L specialists, contractor administration costs, defensive specifications, phasing costs etc.

  • +109 hours needed for SI.9 compliance for a typical house (value €180k) for DC/AC roles only:

RIAI-Fee-calculation-draft-Converted

The house building programme in Ireland this year (2015) will provide in the region of 11,000 new homes. The hours required (as noted above) suggest that over 2.1m “professional hours ” (11,000 x 109 x 1.75*) are required for the housing sector alone for the SI.9 compliance procedure this year, rising annually as the Housing Programme rolls out. The time needed for non-residential projects may double this number on an annual basis. Given the current skills shortage caused by seven years of scaling-back by industry professional firms, this additional administrative burden has implications on the industry capacity to deliver. The recent Government decision to include local authority housing under the complex administrative procedures of SI.9 may generate an additional 3.4 million “professional hours” specific to 20,000 social housing units by 2020. There is no doubt that this extraordinary time pressure will impact on costs, availability of skills and delivery of housing, both public and private, in the next few years.

Key stakeholder professional organisations objected to a recent opt out from the regulations for self-build homes which could take a significant proportion of these professional costs out of this net, and have urged lenders to retain SI.9 as a condition for lending for single dwellings (see link to professional stakeholder reaction below).

Former Minister for the Environment, Phil Hogan, insisted  that the inspection regime could be provided by private inspectors for  €3,000, a view shared by the current Minister Alan Kelly (Link:). As recently as last August, the RIAI wrote to the Department saying that “There seems to be an absence of awareness of the various costs that apply in complying” (Link:) The basis for the fees suggested by former Minister Hogan and Kelly are unclear, and the cost quoted by Ministers of between €1000 – €3000 suggests a maximum of 30 hours only would be needed for SI.9 compliance for a typical house, a remarkable divergence from professional input at the time, and well short of industry assessments currently. The ’30 hour’ regime suggests stage inspections at critical points of the construction rather that the SI.9 service that requires a professional to be “on site all the time” according to the RIAI.

*A multiple of 1.75 has been factored in as the 109 hours refers only to Assigned Certifier cost. Industry indicators are that ancillary certifiers hours on design team etc. are already doubling agreed fees on Public Sector projects.

Other posts of interest:

The Engineers Journal: how BC(A)R SI.9 works in practice

RIAI: time needed for schools- BC(A)R SI.9

BC(A)R SI.9 Submission Series No 8: Stakeholders ACEI, SCSI & RIAI

Building Control Regulations compliance in practice – Engineers Journal

“Want to hear vested interests squeal and throw tantrums?” | Karl Deeter

2 thoughts on “RIAI President | “2 – 3 million hours a year to inspect new house building”

  1. Michael O'Neill MRIAI

    Reply to – RIAI President | “2 – 3 million hours a year to inspect new house building”

    http://www.bregsforum.com/2015/10/20/riai-president-complying-with-si-9-will-require-2-3-million-inspection-hours-p-a-for-house-building-alone/\

    = = = = =

    The article above refers to the need for a professional to be “on site all the time” to correctly address matters to act as an AC/DC.

    There is a separate reference to “+109 hours needed for SI.9 compliance for a typical house (value €180k) for DC/AC roles only”.

    If you are on site “all the time” for a six month build, allowing for 45 hour weeks (including working Saturday mornings) then this is 6 x 4 x 45 hours = 1080 hours approximately.

    So the implication is that 10% of the time is “all the time”, which is surely an embarrassing revelation of how many hours are normally put in by a professional.

    Please correct me if I am wrong.

    Reply
  2. Lester Naughton

    Has anyone else noticed that the recent Department guidance to homeowners/self builders on SI9 refers them to the “draft” inspection plan issued at the latest consultation. As far as I am concerned the Government in doing this has made the rather limited “draft” inspection plan (Complete with the impossibility of inspecting items at a time where if one was visible the other is not) official and I have no choice but to base my quotes for services on this.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Lester Naughton Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *