Is Building Control a threat to Christmas completion of modular homes? | Vivian Cummins

Gift wrapped house

05 November 2015

Anyone at the frontline of Ireland’s homelessness crisis knows that there is only one crucial factor to be considered in the provision of modular homes and that is speed of delivery. The parents trying to provide meals from a wardrobe in a hotel room, to the 1,500 children currently homeless in Ireland, are not concerned about Building Energy Ratings or timber versus carpet floor coverings. They just want their own roof over their heads in time for Christmas or indeed anytime soon.

Dublin City Council and the Department of the Environment have quite a challenge to deliver a Christmas gift of a modular home to 22 families by the 21st December as advertised in their recent Request for Tenders and at the same time comply with current statutory legislation. I wish them all the best with this endeavour.

From an article in yesterday’s Dublin Inquirer (Link: ) it is being suggested that the development of the 22 modular housing units, at the preferred site in Poppintree near Ballymun, will be fast-tracked through the planning process by using Section 179 (6) (b) of the Planning & Development Act 2000*. This means they are bypassing the normal planning process because the Dublin City Council CEO deems the situation to be an emergency. This might mean that the council will skip taking any submissions or observations from the public on the proposal, a process that would normally take a minimum of six weeks.

If the planning procedure is sorted in this way, and I believe the public would support this, it then brings us to the question of Building Regulations (the design and construction of the houses) and Building Control Regulations (supervision and enforcement of the Building Regulations). The Building Regulations and the Building Control Regulations do not distinguish between dwellings assembled on a site in a “traditional” manner, and dwellings assembled off-site and brought to the site pre-finished and ready for occupation. In the same way, there is no distinction under building regulations between a “temporary” and a “permanent” dwelling. All are subject to the same procedures.

From the tender documentation it is clear that the modular homes will have to be designed and constructed in accordance with all statutory Building Regulations. Monitoring this may be another matter when one considers the onerous implications of our current Building Control Regulations aka BC(A)R SI.9. Ironically legislation, introduced only on 1st September 2015 (SI.365), brought Local Authorities into the BC(A)R SI.9 net and Dublin City Council will now have to comply with its consequences in full. The learning curve involved for the Local Authority and the Department of the Environment may be a real eye-opener for officials of the problems associated with SI.9 in trying to deliver housing quickly and economically.

The Building Control Regulations require the serving of a Commencement Notice 14-28 days to the Building Control management System (BCMS) before starting on site and a Completion Certificate, at the earliest, 3-5 weeks before completion. It is unclear who will be the ‘Assigned Certifier’ and ‘Building Owner’ for the purposes of submitting the required Commencement Notice and Completion Certificate and undertaking the responsibility for same.

The above means some of the following programme issues for a completion by 21st December based on tenders submitted on 2nd November and allowing a one week assessment of tenders with the successful bidder notified on 10th November:

  • There is a 14 days standstill period before the contract can be awarded, so this takes us to 24th November for the earliest possible start on site.
  • To start on site on 24th November a Commencement Notice with full BCAR SI.9 documentation must be lodged online to the BCMS, 14-28 days before starting on site, so say 10 November at the latest. This is the day that the contractor may be notified that he has been selected.
  • This means that the Design Certifiers, Assigned Certifier and Builder must be appointed and have full documentation ready to lodge early next week (before they even get a contract).
  • Starting on site on 24th November, the builder then has to work back from 21st December contract completion date.
  • This means the builder/developer has to lodge Completion  documents, confirming the building is correctly built, 3-5 weeks before 21st December, which is 24-30 November, the week he starts on site.
  • Many issues remain around the submission of Completion Certificates for multi-unit housing that have yet to be resolved. I look forward to seeing how this is undertaken in this instance.
  • The Christmas arrangements for the BCMS have not yet been announced. If it is similar to 2014 the BCMS will close for the submission of issuing one day certificates of Completion on Friday 18th December. This means the Certificate of Completion must be lodged on Thursday 17th December 2015 to ensure it is on the Register on the last working day i.e. Friday 18th December 2015. The houses cannot be occupied until the Local Authority confirms that the houses are on the Register. Accordingly the prospective Completion documents will have to be lodged on 26th November 2015 which could be before the project has started.

Have the implications of the Building Control Regulations BC(A)R SI.9 created a scenario where the Assigned Certifier will have to confirm all of his inspections and everyone else’s before the building actually starts in order to meet the completion deadline?

There may be a solution if Dublin City Council treated the houses as 22 one-off separate units and sought an exemption from Building Control Regulations as available under the opt-out provisions of the SI.365 legislation – the very legislation that brought Local Authorities under the remit of the Building Control Regulations. It would be a nice twist if it means less red tape and more red ribbons around a wonderful Christmas gift for 22 families this year.

*Dublin City Council have not verified if this is the case or not.

Vivian Cummins is an architect in private practice and President of the Co. Kildare Chamber of Commerce. He was an RIAI Council member in 2014 and was one of the two individuals who escalated complaints in relation to the planning function at Carlow Co. Council resulting in the Section 255 Independent Investigation commissioned by the DECLG. He has addressed national conferences and commented extensively in print and broadcast media on housing, planning and building regulatory matters.

 Other posts of interest: 

BCMS Alert | Last day for Christmas Completion! 

Completion Certificates for Multi-unit Housing 

Housing crisis rumbles on… the shape of things to come? 

DECLG Information Note |  SI.365 of 2015 

Getting Our Housing in Order | Vivian Cummins

3 thoughts on “Is Building Control a threat to Christmas completion of modular homes? | Vivian Cummins

  1. Joe Large

    4 questions.

    Will these “modular houses” comply with the Renewables requirement of Part L 2011 ?

    Would i be incorrect to guess that they are fitted with electric storage heaters?

    Will the walls, floors & roof meet the irish backstop Uvalue levels ?

    In which case are they going to pass Part L2011 at all ?????

    It would be intresting to see the BER certificates for these “dwellings”

    Reply
  2. Michael Tweed

    The article raises very relevant issues. I suggest it indicates the extent to which the government and the Minister of the Environment are floundering as they drown while being engulfed in the tsunami that is the Irish housing crisis. Perhaps the only upside might be a dawning realisation on their part of the bureaucratic nightmare they’ve created in BCAR SI.9 for absolutely zero improvement for the consumer.
    My sympathies and thoughts are with the poor unfortunate homeless families who won’t be in their prefabs before Christmas.

    Reply
  3. Andrew Alexander MRIAI

    Quite ironic that our beloved SI.9 and SI.365 which were initiated to address and protect consumer needs actually deprives consumers of their most fundamental need – the need and right to occupy a practically completed dwelling.

    Ironic also that in so doing they would be committing a statutory offense!

    While the legislation has relaxed the obligations on the builder (i.e. to build in accordance with the drawings – not the regulations) it makes potential criminals of consumers!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *