Taoiseach Enda Kenny | Independent Building Control Inspectorate?

07 February 2017

A consensus is developing in industry that regulatory red-tape, costs and delays in construction procurement are major barriers to supply in the residential sector.  Politicians and industry experts have questioned the effectiveness of our current system of “reinforced self-certification” and continuing lack of consumer protection as a particular area that needs to be thoroughly re-examined.

The latest blog post by Mason Hayes and Curran Solicitors from 2 February 2017 “Real Estate Update: Ireland’s Housing Crisis” examines the factors influencing the housing crisis in Ireland and explore effective ways to address the problem in 2017- extract:

“Proper standards, not gold plating. Poor construction leads to increased regulation, but the pendulum swung too far and failed to address major issues, such as self-certification. Some welcome changes occurred in 2015 but we need a debate about what we are trying to achieve and how to produce reasonable accommodation with laws that are actually enforced rather than regulations which are very expensive to comply with and yet produce little in the way of practical benefits for occupiers.”

Taoiseach Enda Kenny last month in the Dáil suggested an independent Supervisory body to police the construction sector.  Perhaps government is finally considering beefing up our under-resourced Building Control officers and creating a properly resourced Building Control inspectorate along the lines of the highly effective Fire Safety Authority? See the following Dáil exchange:

In leader’s question in the Dáil on Wednesday, 25 January 2017 (see link here) Catherine Murphy TD asked “While I appreciate the Taoiseach’s recognition that we need a supervisory authority, the fact is local authority building control is greatly underfunded. In many cases claims against builders are statute barred because defects were not noticed by home owners in the legally stipulated period and there are still no solutions for people whose homes were built pre-2014.

The huge legislative gap which exists in this area more than five years after Priory Hall is staggering. How many times must this issue rear its ugly head before the people who are affected by it have some level of certainty about the relief they can seek? Are they forever to be reliant on a Government which acts in an ad hocwait-to-see manner? These are people’s homes and it should be a `Government priority that if anything happens to people’s homes, they should not be left in limbo. The Government’s housing plan is called Rebuilding Ireland. Let us make sure we do it right this time. The Taoiseach should initiate a review of previous housing failures and ensure home owners have somewhere to turn for relief from the mistakes of developers.”

In response  Taoiseach Enda Kenny said “The Deputy will recall that we had question after question in this Chamber for a long period about Priory Hall, with court cases and one thing and another. This was eventually sorted when the Government took action with the other agencies, the same as applied in respect of the defects in Longboat Quay and others. Obviously, things have changed and engineers are required to sign off on certificates of standards, whether on small issues or major developments.

The Deputy makes the point that home owners did not notice the defects. How could they? Many home owners would not have any practical experience of building standards or of how buildings are constructed. Where rogue contractors, either through greed or taking short cuts, put defective buildings together, or fire traps as was the case in Priory Hall, they are guilty of a grossly serious offence. In my view they should never be allowed to build again, or not for a very long time. Their certificates of competency should be withdrawn. We need a supervisory independent clerk of works or authority to say that is not what they got permission for, that is not the standard, and they must take it down and rebuild it. If they find that somebody signs off on a certificate saying it is of quality that it is not, that person should pay the penalty as well.”

Other posts of interest:

Priory Hall & Longboat Quay: “I’m convinced there are others” | Taoiseach Enda Kenny

The State still has no function in testing compliance of building regulations

Housing crisis and building inspection | Eoin O’Cofaigh

Defective “Celtic Tiger” projects : The Cubes | Look Back 17

FACTCHECK: “If my house is defective, Do I have any rights?”

Firetrap Homes | “Fingal CoCo ‘head in the sand’ approach to building control”

Examiner | Housing Defects Special 

Michael Clifford: “when will we address cracks in construction?” Irish Examiner

You can still buy a non-compliant home…and it’s all perfectly legal | SI.9 Loopholes

How many inspections does a build need ? Mark Stephens MRIAI

Minister Coveney confirms Local Authority Homes cost €180,000

One thought on “Taoiseach Enda Kenny | Independent Building Control Inspectorate?

  1. Michael Tweed

    I often wonder what’s the point and purpose of Leader’s questions in the Dáil. The claim is often made that they “hold the Taoiseach to account” . Hardly! Enda Kenny’s response is nothing but waffle. He clearly has no idea what he’s talking about and has no understanding of the complexities of the processes of building design and construction, the complexities of the Planning Acts and Building Control Acts, and a mistaken belief that his remedy in the form of BC(A)R has provided the solution to the problem of buildings not designed or constructed in compliance with the Building Regulations. To be honest I don’t know why this post was published – it’s typical political bluster and crap, and gives me no encouragement that this or any other government are going to the RIGHT thing and introduce full Local Authority Building Control as pertains north of the border!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *