BRegs Weekly | 26 May 2017

26 May 2017 –  BRegs Weekly Edition 108

Edition 108 of BRegs Weekly is out now.

A number of damning official reports into defective buildings continue to remain unpublished by the Department of Housing under Minister Simon Coveney. In a recent Independent article “Cracking up: the legacy of Celtic Tiger Ireland the issue of homes affected by pyrite and mica in Donegal and Mayo was noted. Glacial government response to this particular problem and continued procrastination by officials in publishing an official report  was highlighted in the Seanad on 23rd May 2017.  Pádraig MacLochlainn (Sinn Fein) said This is a failure of the State, of building control legislation and to ensure compression tests guaranteed that the blockwork, the core product in the family home in Ireland, was sound. It was an utter failure of State regulation right through. These families have been failed utterly.” 

Chartered Surveyor Kevin Sheridan examined building control costs for modest residential projects in the Irish Times article Should I opt out of costly compliance paperwork?” Many defective residential schemes have been built under a regime of cowboy  builders, inadequate insurance, a lack of local authority checks and informal sign-off. The 2014 BCAR SI9 regulations reinforced this system of sign-off, putting ‘self certification’ on a statutory basis without dealing with the many root causes in the house building industry. Despite increased costs and paperwork, buyers can not be any more confident of quality and safety under the new system.  There are no new legal rights for buyers and there are still no independent inspections of construction sites. Many think that a BCAR Completion Certificate is a guarantee, but it comes with few consumer protections and no new rights for buyers. If there’s a defect in the house owners will have to go to Court to look for redress; this could take many years and the outcome is not guaranteed.

Architect Brian Montaut echoed the concerns surrounding Developer-led  ‘reinforced self-certification’ a subsequent letter to the editor Building regulations and self-certification“In 2014 statutory certification of buildings was devised following the Priory Hall debacle… At its core, however, is a system inexplicably built around self-certification, ie certification by the participants themselves. Those procedures culminate in an overall certificate, which is filed by the local authority… Overall, statutory self-certification adds time and cost without creating any new form of redress; unless, having legitimised these certificates in the eyes of the ordinary citizen, the local authority is held responsible.

The BRegs Weekly e-zine gathers all recent social media discussions relating to Building Control Regulations into one weekly digest. It is published every Friday and gives a round-up of news highlights for the week.  We recommend signing up for an automatic subscription to keep up with the discussion surrounding the current annual review of the BC(A)R, and more recent media articles and stories about building control and the impacts on the consumer and construction industry.

Click Here to read: BRegs Weekly : Edition 108

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *