28 June 2017
In 2014, the BRegs Blog examined the cost of a proper independent building control inspectorate. In Ireland as there are “…the same number of dog wardens – 67 (46 full-time & 21 part time) as there are Building Control Officers (BCO)” the Blog was able to establish, with some accuracy, the cost of additional staff required to implement a fully independent system of local authority inspectors in accordance with international best practice. The following post is from August 2016:
How much would 100% independent inspections by Local Authorities cost?
There are about 67 building control officers in Ireland , many doubling up as fire officers (see post below).
We have not been able to extract out the current cost of building control as these are lumped in with planning and enforcement for Local Authority budgetary purposes. In earlier posts, based on the UK model, we estimated that 200 additional Local Authority staff were required to undertake a 100% nationwide inspection of all buildings .
Recently the Irish Times reported – “Dog wardens issued more fines last year than in past decade“. According to this article there are the same number of dog wardens – 67 (46 full-time & 21 part time) as there are Building Control Officers (BCO) at a nett cost €3.9m when income from fines is accounted for.* This is a cost per Local Authority staff member of €58,200.
Based on these recent figures, the cost of 200 additional BCO staff to achieve 100% Local Authority independent inspections nationwide would be €11.64m.
This cost for independent Local Authority inspections seems like very good value when compared to an estimated cost to the industry and consumer for S.I.9 of over €700m per annum and a cost to remediate pyrite of €780m (DECLG estimate of pre-2012 cases).
An annual cost to the taxpayer of a little over €11m to regulate a €10bn industry would give the consumer the benefit of a proper independent building control inspectorate, as opposed to continuing with our defective system of self-certification at vast cost to both taxpayer and consumer.
The bill for poor regulation at just one development, Priory Hall, is currently running at €30m. S.I.9 costs for one year alone would fund 100% Local Authority independent inspections for 60 years. Self building could resume and this would create 800 more houses this year. Consumers would be protected – no more Priory Halls. Pyrite would be policed at a taxpayer saving of over €780m.
Is the Department of the Environment being penny wise and pound foolish?
Notes: *Net cost less income from fines. We believe there are 5 staff separately employed now processing claims for pyrite remediation.
Other posts of interest:
€ 5 billion | The extraordinary cost of S.I.9 self-certification by 2020
Pyrite: the spiraling cost of no Local Authority Inspections
The cost of a Solution to BC(A)R SI.9?
The € 500 million + cost of S.I.9 in 2014 | Residential Sector
SI.9 to Cost €168m in 2014 | Non-Residential Sector
SI.9 costs for a typical house
More dog wardens than building inspectors in Ireland- Self Builders to be made extinct
Other posts in “Look-Back” series
Defective “Celtic Tiger” projects : The Cubes | Look Back 17
Building Regulations add to Vacancy Rates | Look Back 16
Here’s How to Avoid Another Longboat Quay: Dublin Inquirer | Look Back 15
Notes from the (thermal) edge: Part L Compliance (2 of 2) | Look Back 14
Building Surveyor’s Inspection Plan + Form | Look Back 13
Murray letter to Senators: BC(A)R SI.9 (SI.105) | Look Back 12
Is the scene set for another Priory Hall? | Look Back 11
Simon Carswell: Politicians, Construction industry lobbying and banking | Look Back 10
Legal perspective: consumer benefit? BC(A)R SI.9 | Look Back 9
Minister Hogan defends BC(A)R SI.9 | Look Back 8
Christmas Past – What did you hope for from Santa in 2013? Look Back 7
Ghost estates and public housing: BC(A)R SI.9 | Look Back 6
Government Reports + Professional Opinion Ignored in SI.9 | Look Back 5
SCSI | “Highly unlikely Priory Hall would happen in Britain”- Look Back 4
BRAB and BC(A)R SI.9- Look Back 3
Inadequate Regulatory Impact Assessment for S.I.9- Look Back 2